John O'Meara

Shakespearean, neo-Romantic critic

John O'Meara Shakespeare Shakespearean Romanticism Literary Critic Novalis

All 9 essays on this page, as well as the 7 that ***appear on the page “From the Underground” have now been coll

***

Note that, except for the first title, all essays on this page, as well as the 7 that appear

on the page “From the Underground”

have now been collected in

TRAGICAL HISTORICAL

Late Essays in Western Cultural History

from Boethius to Beckett

Downloadable at

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365842850_Tragical_Historical_Late_Essays_in_Western_Cultural_History_from_Boethius_to_Beckett

also, at

https://www.academia.edu/99518463/Tragical_Historical_Late_Essays_in_Western_Cultural_History_from_Boethius_to_Beckett

_____________________________________________________

OPPOSITIONS

I

The Power of Nothing: The Limits of Non-Participation

in Act 1 Scene 1 of King Lear

(drafted August-September 2018)

Awaiting publication

A thorough revaluation of tragic developments in Act I scene 1 of 'King Lear' based on a closer reading of the scene than has ever been offered. The many problems with critical reception of this scene. In every sphere of commentary on this scene, the main point of Cordelia’s pretensions has been missed (pretensions forced upon her by her social inability at a certain level of performance)--namely, that there is an absolute limit to non-participation and that ‘nothing’, as an actual condition of existence, reserves a power that no one can pretend to revert to, let alone champion, or brave—as we see from the awful event it unleashes that is beyond the control of everyone.


II

Macbeth, Gulliver's Travels, and the Limits of "The Civilizing Process"

(drafted June-July 2018)

Within the act of beholding violence lies a point of “stillness” that constitutes at once a problem from the moral point of view, as well as offering a solution to this problem. There is a problem inasmuch as, at this point of stillness, resistance to violence is paralyzed, while at the same time a moral sphere opens up as if in direct reaction to this. Silence emerges from this stillness as its own phenomenon, challenging a moral response in spite of the paralyzing effect. However, a culture of silence was far from being developed as an effective moral mainstay in the sphere of action either in Shakespeare’s day or in Swift’s, whether in the perpetration or beholding of violence.


III

Dr. Faustus

and Pascal’s Pensées

(drafted October 2020)


IV

Denis de Rougemont’s Undoing

of Phèdre as High Tragedy

(drafted October 2020)


V

Denis de Rougemont,

Wagner,

and Nietzsche

(drafted December 2020/January 2021)


VI

Reading Hemingway

in The Myth of Sisyphus

(drafted October/November 2020)

https://issuu.com/johnomeara1797/docs/reading_hemingway_in_the_myth_of_sisyphus


VII

Beyond Domination, Repression, and the Absurd:

The Last Pages of Eros and Civilization /

Jung and the Tragic Survival

(drafted November/December 2020)

VIII

Nietzsche and Emerson

(drafted January 2021)

https://issuu.com/johnomeara1797/docs/nietzsche_and_emerson



IX

Re-claiming Goethe for Tragedy:

The Outstanding Case of Faust Part One

(drafted January 2021)